They Didn't Just Ban the Flag, They Banned the Body: Neutrality Policy, Intersectional Critique and Legal Contestation in California Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24974/amae/20.4.574Palabras clave:
Political neutrality; policy mobility; administrative discretion; teacher speech; LGBTQ+ inclusionResumen
This study examines a legal challenge brought by two Chicana ethnic studies educators against their California school district following the implementation of Board Policy 6144, a political neutrality policy governing “controversial issues.” Drawing on testimonios, we examine how the policy traveled into a local district, how administrators weaponized its vague language and how its enforcement disproportionately targeted LGBTQ+-inclusive classroom practices while leaving other political and religious expressions undisturbed. We argue that neutrality has nothing to do with pedagogical principles and more to do with whose knowledge and identities belong in a public school and whose presence needs to be managed. The case also underscores the importance of collective bargaining and statutory labor protections, which provide educators with formal avenues for recourse and accountability when administrative overreach occurs. By tracing how neutrality policies travel, acquire legitimacy and become selectively enforced, this study shows how growing attacks on LGBTQ+ inclusion and educator autonomy take shape through everyday administrative discretion.
